NOBEL PRIZE WINNER ADMITS TO RAPING HUNDREDS OF BLACK BOYS AND GETS AWAY WITH IT
The Nobel prize that is awarded to many around the globe for art, sciences, and humanitarian efforts isn’t as “Noble” as they make it, in fact its sometimes used as an alibi for the most sickest crimes. Daniel Carleton Gajdusek, a Nobel Prize-winning scientist celebrated for his work on kuru in the 1950s and 1960s, used his prestige to mask heinous crimes against vulnerable Black boys from New Guinea and Micronesia. His 1976 Nobel Prize in Medicine, awarded for research on infectious diseases among the Fore people, gave him an aura of untouchability that shielded him from accountability for decades. Gajdusek brought dozens of children—mostly boys—from these regions to the United States under the guise of offering them education and opportunity. Instead, he exploited his position of power, sexually abusing at least one boy, with prosecutors suspecting more victims. His own journals, filled with explicit accounts of sexual encounters with boys, were published and distributed by the National Institutes of Health, yet raised little alarm until 1996.
In 1997, Gajdusek pleaded guilty to child molestation, admitting to abusing a Micronesian boy he brought to the U.S. Despite the gravity of his crimes, he served only 12 months in prison, a lenient sentence that allowed him to flee to Europe after release, where he lived freely until his death in 2008. The Nobel laureate’s status, coupled with his scientific contributions, seemingly softened the consequences of his actions, exposing a system that prioritizes prestige over justice. This case underscores a broader issue: the exploitation of Black and Indigenous boys, often overlooked by institutions that fail to scrutinize powerful figures.
Protecting Black boys from such abuse requires dismantling the structures that enable predators like Gajdusek to operate with impunity. His actions were not isolated; they reflect a pattern where wealth, status, and cultural relativism excuse harm against marginalized communities. The boys he targeted, far from their families and cultures, were uniquely vulnerable, their voices silenced by distance and systemic indifference. Advocacy for Black boys demands vigilance—ensuring no title, no award, no reputation shields those who prey on the powerless. It means amplifying survivors’ stories, holding institutions accountable, and fostering environments where Black boys are seen, heard, and protected.
SUBSCRIBE. SHARE. STAY TUNED. THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED 2RAW4TV.TV
